<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Starter Wife! Oh my&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theoryculture.com/42/the-starter-wife-oh-my/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theoryculture.com/42/the-starter-wife-oh-my/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Price of Freedom:Heteronormativity &#38; Human Blood, $399 and up &#171; Objectify This</title>
		<link>http://theoryculture.com/42/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Price of Freedom:Heteronormativity &#38; Human Blood, $399 and up &#171; Objectify This</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theorymyculture.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] of symbolic emblems of independence denotes freedom is denoted by is pathetically ironic. John on Theory My Culture notes that Slate.com writer Seth Stevenson &#8220;makes a funny remark on the Pond’s/USA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of symbolic emblems of independence denotes freedom is denoted by is pathetically ironic. John on Theory My Culture notes that Slate.com writer Seth Stevenson &#8220;makes a funny remark on the Pond’s/USA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marinaw</title>
		<link>http://theoryculture.com/42/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>marinaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 07:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theorymyculture.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>wow, thanks for the great post. it&#039;s truly alarming that Mulvey&#039;s theories about spectatorship transition so nicely into Debord&#039;s about consumers. I haven&#039;t read him yet and look forward to it.
Marina W. (ObjectifyThis)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, thanks for the great post. it&#8217;s truly alarming that Mulvey&#8217;s theories about spectatorship transition so nicely into Debord&#8217;s about consumers. I haven&#8217;t read him yet and look forward to it.<br />
Marina W. (ObjectifyThis)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://theoryculture.com/42/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theorymyculture.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>&quot;Competition between women is the classic diversionary conflict, but that’s just fab for certain ideological forms - in particular, capitalism, which counts on the individuation of conflict in order to divert the attentive gaze away from questions of systematic exploitation.&quot;
...
&quot;they will surely reproduce notions of empowering that, well, just move the pieces around. And never think about alternative ways of living. That’s exactly what it means to say that ideology reproduces itself across seemingly real and even radical social changes.&quot;

I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Competition between women is the classic diversionary conflict, but that’s just fab for certain ideological forms &#8211; in particular, capitalism, which counts on the individuation of conflict in order to divert the attentive gaze away from questions of systematic exploitation.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;<br />
&#8220;they will surely reproduce notions of empowering that, well, just move the pieces around. And never think about alternative ways of living. That’s exactly what it means to say that ideology reproduces itself across seemingly real and even radical social changes.&#8221;</p>
<p>I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://theoryculture.com/42/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theorymyculture.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/the-starter-wife-oh-my/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Seth Stevenson is one of my favorite writers, and I love the link he puts in that piece about the right-hand diamond ring--to a 2003 press release by the diamond industry, pushing this new product, the diamond you buy for yourself. Really very funny, very terrible. I felt myself pulled into watching the show--they&#039;ve been running ads for it since the last season of Monk, a show that totally rocks. Now I&#039;m giving it a second thought.

But speaking of creams, women, and ideology, any thoughts on Dove&#039;s &quot;campaign for real beauty&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth Stevenson is one of my favorite writers, and I love the link he puts in that piece about the right-hand diamond ring&#8211;to a 2003 press release by the diamond industry, pushing this new product, the diamond you buy for yourself. Really very funny, very terrible. I felt myself pulled into watching the show&#8211;they&#8217;ve been running ads for it since the last season of Monk, a show that totally rocks. Now I&#8217;m giving it a second thought.</p>
<p>But speaking of creams, women, and ideology, any thoughts on Dove&#8217;s &#8220;campaign for real beauty&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

